INSIDE THE COLLAPSE OF LEGAL OVERSIGHT BEFORE U.S. BOAT STRIKES
In the wake of multiple U.S. military strikes against suspected drug trafficking vessels in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific in 2025, a growing body of legal experts—including retired military lawyers, national security scholars, and former Judge Advocates General—have raised grave concerns about the legality and conduct of these operations. Central to these concerns are allegations that:
​
-
Legal oversight in the Department of Defense was dismantled well before the boat strikes by Secretary Hegseth and the Trump administration.
​
-
The strikes—including follow-on attacks on survivors—violate both U.S. and international law.
​
-
Senior military legal advisers (JAGs) were sidelined or removed prior to the operations.
​
-
The Office of the Secretary of Defense, under Pete Hegseth, issued or endorsed unlawful orders while concealing legal justification from Congress and the public.
​
-
These actions risk undermining the rule of law, exposing U.S. personnel to war crimes liability, and damaging civil-military trust.
​
The facts, sourced from public reporting and expert commentary between November and December 2025, outline a sequence of decisions and breakdowns in oversight that enabled these outcomes.
TIMELINE OF KEY EVENTS (NOV-DEC 2025)
Early 2025: - Secretary Pete Hegseth begins reshaping Pentagon legal leadership, reportedly firing or sidelining service Judge Advocates General. He rebrands the Department of Defense as the “Department of War” and calls for an end to “politically correct” rules of engagement.
Nov. 22: Washington Post reports internal Pentagon and CIA lawyers warned that planned boat strikes may be unlawful but were ignored or overruled.
​
Nov. 28: - Washington Post reveals Hegseth gave a directive to “kill them all,” allegedly leading to a follow-on strike on survivors of an initial boat attack.
​
Nov. 29: Military law experts publish warning of ethical breakdown and legality concerns.
​
Dec 1 - 3: - Just Security publish further legal analyses and FAQ on boat strikes.
Dec 1: - Bipartisan members of Congress call for “vigorous oversight."
​
“The Committee is aware of recent news reports - and the Department of Defense’s initial response - regarding alleged follow-on strike on suspected narcotics vessels in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility. The committee has directed inquiries to the Department, and we will be conducting vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to these circumstances.” - Senators Roger Wicker (R-MS) and Jack Reed (D-RI), Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate Armed Services Committee
Dec 1: Legal Experts publish list of questions Congress should ask.
ILLEGALITY OF THE STRIKES: EXPERT OPINION
“Kill them all – that is not an order that can be followed. We’re supposed to be the good guys. We have always prided ourselves on being an honorable military. We have crossed the line here into clear illegality and clear dishonor.” ​
– Major General (Ret.) Steve Lepper, Former Deputy Judge Advocate General, US Air Force. (The New Yorker)
“Killing them while shipwrecked, while they’re out of the fight, is a war crime… extrajudicial killing, which is murder under international law, under our domestic law. There is no authority to do this.”
​​
—Dan Maurer Retired Lt. Colonel, US Army JAG; currently associate professor of law, Ohio Northern University Pettit College of Law; Fellow, National Institute of Military Justice (All Rise News)
​
“The military has a great planning system. And you look at what are possible contingencies. It's almost inconceivable to me that a good planning system wouldn't have said, what if we don't kill everybody on the first strike? What do we do with the survivors? What are our legal responsibilities? What resources do we have to take care of those survivors?" ​​
​
– Rear Adm (Ret.) William Dale Baumgartner, Former Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District; Former Judge Advocate General and Chief Counsel, US Coast Guard (MSNOW)​
“We believe the orders that were given – and the orders that were executed all along what we call the ‘kill chain’ – were unlawful. They should not have been given, they should not have been obeyed, and those who gave and obeyed those orders should be held responsible.”​
​
– Major General (Ret.) Steve Lepper, Former Deputy Judge Advocate General, US Air Force. (The Christian Science Monitor)
“This wasn’t a battlefield. This was maritime law enforcement gone rogue...Firing on survivors adrift in open water is a war crime, full stop.” ​
​
— Margaret Donovan, Former Assistant US Attorney; former US Army Judge Advocate; Visiting Lecturer at Yale Law School (YouTube)
“The military justice system has to address these issues. If it doesn’t because of pressure from above, then that system itself will be collateral damage. Secretary Hegseth may not think that’s important, but anyone who cares about the proper administration of justice will disagree.” ​
​
– Eugene Fidell. Senior Research Scholar at Yale Law School; Leading Expert on Military Justice; Former Judge Advocate, US Coast Guard. (The Contrarian)